Basically, this rule is just that: A good example is in Superhero stories, wherein a singular villain may be a match for an entire team of superheroes, but if said villain joins a group of villains, suddenly they lose to just one of them. Similarly, a villain may be taking down entire groups of superheroes, but when one hero steps out to take them on alone, watch out.
This is in relation to a variety of people wanting to control a particular situation. A variation of this theme is where nobody wants to take full responsibility for making any decisions and passes the buck.
Sometimes there are more than one inventor co-inventorsor the invention is a family affair involving the wife, son, daughter, mother, father, nephews, uncles, neighbors, even aliens from another planetetc. Then the individual has to begin the process all over again with Frank Smith, who may disagree with Joe.
Either everybody has their own ideas of how things should go, or nobody seems to have full responsibility for making a decision. As a result, there is either arguing among the group, or discussions go in circles from person to person.
Because it is extremely difficult to get agreement on any course of action, potential deals fall apart. In these situations, I see that the invention is "encumbered". No matter how good the invention is, it will be impossible for any progress to take place as long as the group structure remains this way.
Astute businessmen or professionals will assess the situation and will quickly walk away from an "encumbered" project. If the group cannot make any decisions regarding the invention, the invention is doomed to waste away as the life and value of the patent continues to diminish each year. Most of the time, this happens because the group is not structured as a business, but rather as an informal group without policies or an organizational structure.
Therefore the responsibilities of each member are vague. The group also lacks clear cut goals for the future of the invention, and has no sense of direction. To correct this, the group needs to decide on one person who will be able to discuss things with the group as necessary, who will also be the focal contact to represent the group when speaking with interested parties.
Then the group should set ongoing meetings to review the progress of the invention and make sure that the group is on track.
Too many cooks spoil the broth. Too much of anything is good for nothing. This famous proverb literally means that when many cooks are engaged to prepare the broth they will spoil it instead of making it delicious as every cook will cook it according to his own taste and talent. The candidate is required to write a story which illustrates the saying “Too many cooks spoil the broth”. There were very few attempts on this subject. A good majority did not illustrate the saying. Jan 17, · Too many cooks may not always spoil the broth, the diverse culture of progressive and thriving democracy of India having so many languages, religions and ethnicity explains this well. On the same principles works our Parliament, the symbol of deliberative democracy.
Stephen Paul Gnass is founder of InventionConvention. Gnass speaks on the subject of the "Business of Inventing" [tm] and has had his articles reprinted in various magazines. As Senior Consultant with the Gnass Group, he consults independent inventors, entrepreneurs, and small businesses.
He can be emailed at gnass businessofinventing. For a Complimentary Brainstorm, please be sure to include your phone number with area code and your time zone [continental U. Sincerely Stephen Paul Gnass P.
I offer additional brainstorming as part of the cyber- exhibiting program. Or, if you have special projects or problems and you need some brainstorming, I also offer a-la- carte consulting sessions with a special rate for inventors.
Situations like these, that I describe in these articles, are snapshots at the time that I write them. Things may change, for example, U.
Patent and Trademark Office rules or laws may change, etc. Feel free to email me at subscribers inventionconvention. This article is for general information purposes only and is not a substitute for legal counsel or financial services.
The information provided is accurate to the best of our knowledge, and we are not liable for any omissions or incorrect information.
It is the responsibility of the reader to verify any legal information with appropriate professionals. If you need specific legal assistance, we recommend that you contact an attorney or accountant.
This article is for the personal use of the subscriber and may be emailed to friends and family in its entirety.Insights Weekly Essay Challenges – Week Archives.
17 January Write an essay on the following topic in not more than words: “Too many cooks spoil the broth”. Jan 17, · Too many cooks may not always spoil the broth, the diverse culture of progressive and thriving democracy of India having so many languages, religions and ethnicity explains this well.
On the same principles works our Parliament, the symbol of deliberative democracy. Too many cooks spoil the broth. Too much of anything is good for nothing. This famous proverb literally means that when many cooks are engaged to prepare the broth they will spoil it instead of making it delicious as every cook will cook it .
To sum up, we can say that too many hands always create confusion. In a house with too many servants or masters, there will be no order. So, cooks in . the heat in the pot until the last tired cowpoke was served.
Today, many fine cooks still insist upon a Dutch oven for roasting meats or preparing special holiday Words; 3 Pages; Research On Cooking Enthusiasts - Us - October While many Americans cook at home, they come to the table with different skill sets and motivations for doing so.
To sum up, we can say that too many hands always create confusion. In a house with too many servants or masters, there wiil be no order. So, cooks in a kitchen, if too many, spoil the dish.